Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sho Shimabukuro vs Jea Moon Lee Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shimabukuro vs Lee analysis and find out who is favored!
Sho Shimabukuro vs Jea Moon Lee Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Shimabukuro 1 - 0 Lee
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shimabukuro has won 49.37% of points on his second serve, while Lee has won 45.96%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shimabukuro, in recent form, has won 48.1% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lee has won 51.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.46% and 35.87% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shimabukuro has saved 54.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lee has saved 50.53% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shimabukuro has won 47.37% of matches played (W/L 27/ 30), with Lee winning 60.98% (W/L 25/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shimabukuro has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 22/ 19). Lee has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 16/ 7), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Shimabukuro has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.39% of matches (W/L 15/ 16), where as Lee has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.1% of matches (W/L 25/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Shimabukuro winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Shimabukuro winning 2 and Lee winning 0. The last match between Shimabukuro and Lee was at the Gwangju Challenger, 16-04-2024, First, Hard with Sho Shimabukuro getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:13:52.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Shimabukuro and Lee have played a deciding set 0 times, with Shimabukuro winning 0 times and Lee 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Shimabukuro winning 0, and Lee 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shimabukuro has played against opponents with an average rank of 295.18 while Lee has played against players with an average rank of 127.41.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shimabukuro has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lee has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shimabukuro has converted 51.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lee has converted 39.32% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
223
Rank
135
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
659
Rank
466
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
62% (215-133)
Career Total W/L
66% (182-92)
26% (5-14)
YTD W/L
36% (4-7)
$196,505
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Shimabukuro VS Lee H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Sho Shimabukuro | Jea Moon Lee |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:13:52 | 1:13:52 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (34/60) | 66% (33/50) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (26/34) | 64% (21/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 62% (16/26) | 41% (7/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (22/50) | 30% (18/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Shimabukuro VS Lee H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Jea Moon Lee
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sho Shimabukuro | Jea Moon Lee |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 26% (5/14) | 36% (4/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 35% (15/28) | 38% (10/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (186/226) | 45% (111/133) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 36% (4/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 58 | 18 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.09 |
| DFs Total | 46 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:33 | 1:46:23 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 317.42 | 138.36 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (746/1305) | 70% (514/737) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (503/746) | 63% (326/514) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (276/559) | 45% (100/223) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (40/78) | 38% (30/78) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (420/1214) | 39% (314/797) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 38% (5/8) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 28% (5/18) | 36% (4/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 63% (8/5) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 38% (8/3) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (11/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Sho Shimabukuro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
84)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
5-7 6-1 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
12
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Seong Chan Hong
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Jea Moon Lee
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
13
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
9 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jea Moon Lee Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Jea Moon Lee
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Jea Moon Lee
61%
(
73 of
120)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
6
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
0
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
39%
(
47 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
117
Total Points Won
107
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yi Zhou
Player
Jea Moon Lee
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
3
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jea Moon Lee
Player
Hayato Matsuoka
70%
(
71 of
101)
1st Serve %
74%
(
75 of
102)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
45 of
75)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jea Moon Lee
Player
Keisuke Saitoh
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
91
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryotaro Taguchi
Player
Jea Moon Lee
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
80%
(
73 of
91)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jea Moon Lee
Player
Tianhui Zhang
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yi Zhou
Player
Jea Moon Lee
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jea Moon Lee
Player
Daiki Yoshimura
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
79%
(
49 of
62)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Jea Moon Lee
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
81%
(
51 of
63)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Shimabukuro Vs Lee Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
